The Liaoning High People’s Court lifted property restraints on the ground that they exceeded the amount claimed. The judgment creditor disputed that decision and retained Li Shu’s team to seek reconsideration and protect the measures securing its claim.
The team raised issues concerning the objectivity of the property valuation, whether unvalued equity could be measured by subscribed capital and the opportunities to examine valuation materials and participate in a hearing.
According to YunTing’s account, the Supreme People’s Court set aside the enforcement ruling and remanded the matter to the Liaoning High People’s Court for renewed examination. The treatment of the specific restraints remained a matter for that further review.