A Henan entrepreneur was accused of refusing to comply with an effective civil judgment after funds entered an account without repayment being made. Li Shu’s team acted during the review for prosecution.
The lawyers examined bank statements, the disposition of the funds and the enforcement history. Their submissions addressed whether funds had been transferred or concealed and whether the evidence established intentional criminal refusal to comply, considering the facts as a whole rather than treating the absence of an account freeze as decisive.
According to YunTing’s account, the procuratorate issued a non-prosecution decision and lifted the release-on-guarantee measure.